Seen but not counted: The hidden cost of ignoring women veterans

Kate Robinson

Dr

Originally published by The Big Smoke on the 5th of March 2026.

If Australia is serious about veteran wellbeing, it must start by recognising all who served. Until then, women veterans will continue to be seen but not counted.

Australia likes to believe it honours those who serve. Yet for many women veterans, service ends not with recognition, but with erasure.

Despite decades of contribution across every role in the Australian Defence Force (ADF), women veterans remain under-recognised, under-represented, and routinely excluded from the very systems designed to support veterans. This invisibility is not symbolic. It has serious consequences for mental health, access to care, economic security and, in some cases, survival.

Public imagination continues to default to a narrow image of the veteran: male, combat-focussed, and physically injured. Women who have served frequently report being mistaken for partners or dependents, having their service questioned, or being asked to justify their veteran status.

This persistent cultural blind spot matters. Research from the UK and Australia shows many women do not identify with the term veteran, not because they did not serve, but because the identity feels male-coded and exclusionary. Identity matters because self-identification as a veteran is a key gateway to accessing support, entitlements and community connection.

In short: if you don’t see yourself as a veteran, the system doesn’t see you either.

Under-recognition does not stop at public perception. Many women veterans describe ex-service organisations and veteran spaces as male-dominated, culturally alienating and, at times, hostile. This is not simply about discomfort; it is about access.

Veteran communities often act as informal entry points to information, peer support and referrals. When women feel unwelcome or invisible in these spaces, they are more likely to disengage entirely. This disengagement reduces early help-seeking and increases isolation during transition, compounding existing vulnerabilities.

Systems built around men’s experiences inevitably fail those whose service does not fit the mould.

The cost of under-recognition is most stark in mental health outcomes. Australian data indicates that women veterans experience higher rates of anxiety, depression and post-traumatic stress disorder than civilian women.

More concerningly, women veterans face a significantly elevated suicide risk compared to civilian women. These outcomes do not occur in isolation. Many women veterans carry layered trauma, including high rates of sexual harassment and assault during service, followed by disbelief, minimisation or bureaucratic resistance once they leave.

The Royal Commission into Defence and Veteran Suicide has identified systemic failure, identity loss, and cultural harm as key contributors to veteran distress. For women veterans, invisibility acts as a multiplier, intensifying psychological injury and discouraging help-seeking.

Under-recognition also plays out in healthcare and compensation systems that remain poorly attuned to women’s needs. Women veterans frequently report difficulties having service-related conditions recognised, particularly where injuries or illnesses do not align with traditionally male service profiles.

Conditions such as reproductive health issues, chronic pain, and trauma-related illness are often under-assessed or inadequately understood. Many women describe exhausting claims processes and repeated requests to “prove” their service or injuries, experiences that can be re-traumatising and lead some to disengage from the system altogether.

A system that does not fully recognise women’s service cannot adequately respond to women’s injuries.

Recognition is not about ceremonial gestures. It is about visibility in data, policy, leadership, and funding decisions.

When women veterans are undercounted, they are underrepresented in employment programs, housing initiatives, research agendas, and veteran governance structures. This invisibility reinforces the misconception that women veterans are a marginal or emerging cohort rather than a long-standing and growing part of Australia’s veteran community.

Conversely, research shows that when women veterans are acknowledged and supported through gender-informed programs, engagement improves and well-being outcomes strengthen. Belonging enables recovery. Recognition enables belonging.

What needs to change

Australia has taken steps forward, including the Department of Veterans’ Affairs Women Veterans Strategy and Women Veterans Forum. However, meaningful change requires sustained structural reform, including:

  • Normalising women as veterans in public narratives and commemorations, such as ANZAC Day
  • Embedding gender-informed practice across healthcare, compensation and transition services
  • Funding women-specific veteran programs and leadership pathways
  • Improving data collection to ensure women’s outcomes are visible
  • Ensuring women veterans are represented in policy and decision-making processes

Women veterans are not invisible because they did not serve. They are invisible because our systems were not built to see them.

Under-recognition is not a cultural oversight; it is a structural failure with real human cost. If Australia is serious about veteran wellbeing, it must start by recognising all who served.

Until then, women veterans will continue to be seen, but not counted.