30 June 2025 / Latest Articles

‘Never truly designed for us’: The hidden cost of military service for women

Llani (LJ) Kennealy

First Published: Womens Agenda 24 Jun 2025

 

Throughout my more than 30-year career in the Australian Defence Force, the recurring questions have lingered: Can women really serve in combat? Can they carry a pack? Can they drag a teammate to safety under fire?

These questions have, for as long as I can recall, been spoken loudly in public forums and whispered quietly in corridors.

The truth is, I’ve carried many different packs. Some heavy with ammunition, rations, and gear. Others, heavier still, filled with the unseen weight of silence, harassment, betrayal, and responsibility. Not all packs weigh the same, nor can they be easily emptied. And for women in the military, some are carried forever.

During my period of service, I have been located on operational bases, in war zones, on exercises, in headquarters, within the United Nations, within the walls of defence reform, and now as an advocate for veterans. I am a mother, wife, leader, friend and veteran. But most enduringly, I am a woman who spent her adult life inside systems never truly designed for us.

The military taught me how to lead with discipline, how to act with purpose, and how to adapt and overcome. It also taught me something else: silence.

As a woman in uniform, I learned quickly that speaking up, especially about harm committed within the ranks, was dangerous. And as I rose in rank and responsibility, the line I walked became razor thin. As the inaugural Gender Advisor to the Chief of Air Force, Defence’s Director of Australia’s National Action Plan on Women, Peace and Security, and later a Strategic Military Advisor to the UN, I became one of the women my sisters in arms came to when things went wrong.

They came with stories of sexual assault, harassment, bullying, silencing, gaslighting, medical neglect, and mental health crises. Some were formally reported. Others never could be. Some of these experiences were turned back on the victim and shaped into weapons that destroyed lives, families and careers.

They came to me because they thought I could help. That I might assist in making it right. That I would believe them. And I did. I always did.

I was not their manager or commander. I was their confidant, someone they could trust when they didn’t feel safe going through official channels. I carried their stories not with authority, but with responsibility. I listened. I offered counsel. I laid out options. And I sat with them as they weighed the risks, most often concluding that the potential damage to their reputation, their mental health and future career felt too high. For many, reporting was not a safe option. The system, they feared, would not protect them.

But belief is not enough when the system demands proof that is rarely accessible and offers protection that rarely holds, often affording more protection to the perpetrator than the victim.

I carry those stories, entrusted to me by women from Baghdad to Canberra, whispered on deployments, shared behind closed doors at training bases, spoken in fragile voices across conference tables in the United Nations. I carry them still. They haunt me not just for what happened, but for what didn’t. Because too often, I knew the truth: the system would not protect them. And I could not lie.

What do you say to someone who asks, “Should I report?” when you know the process will retraumatise them? When you know the burden of justice will fall on her, and the shield of protection will fall over the perpetrator.

Even harder, perhaps, is the silence I’ve maintained about my own experiences. I have never publicly spoken of them. Never confided in someone senior. Never sought redress. Not because it didn’t matter. But because I knew the cost, to my credibility, my career, my sense of control, would be too high.

So, I bore witness to others’ pain while swallowing my own. Conflicted and feeling like a fraud.

That is the double burden of leadership as a woman in defence. You are asked to uphold and support a system that harms you, and many others, while trying to reform it from within. We are told we must work with the system to change it. But at what cost?

What does it do to a person to be trusted with truth, only to be part of its betrayal?

For years, I believed in reform. I wrote policies, strategies, and action plans. I trained gender advisors and in various roles worked with Defence and the UN to develop programs. I believed we could shift culture through structure. But what I’ve come to realise, painfully, is that culture doesn’t change because a framework, strategy or policy was approved. It changes when leaders act with courage, when principles are not compromised for comfort, and when accountability is real.

They ask if women can drag a teammate to safety under fire, as if that’s the ultimate proof of our right to serve. But what happens when it’s a woman under fire, not from an enemy combatant, but from harassment, abuse, or institutional neglect? Where is the team then helping them find safety? Too often, we are not the ones being dragged to safety,  we are the ones left behind. The battlefield is no longer just physical. It’s psychological. It’s systemic. And when the enemy is inside the wire, we don’t call it combat, we call it “culture.”

I have watched women fight for their dignity, their health, and their careers while the system that promised to protect them looked away. And I’ve stood with them, knowing full well that we were asking women not only to serve but to survive two wars: one on the field, and one within our own changerooms.

We do not need more reviews, cultural change programs or champions.  We need leadership rooted in integrity, not reputation. We need systems that prioritise the safety of individuals over the protection of institutions. We need leaders who are not only brave enough to listen, but brave enough to act.

Exceptionalising or ‘fixing’ women is not the answer. Too often, the focus of reform lands on women themselves. How to make them more resilient, more ready, more able to thrive in an unchanged environment. This misdirected approach pathologises women instead of addressing the deep structural failures of the institution. It asks those already carrying the pack to grab more and add to the weight.

We must reframe the centre of gravity in reform. It must begin with leadership underpinned by the moral courage to act. It must be upheld by accountability. Without these, change remains cosmetic.

And the costs of this failure are devastating:

  • Women veterans are twice as likely to die by suicide compared to civilian women.
  • Those who are medically discharged are nearly five times more likely to die by suicide than women who have never served.
  • 52.1 per cent of women veterans report at least one long-term health condition, compared to 35.9 per cent of women in the general population.
  • The Royal Commission into Defence and Veteran Suicide recorded nearly 800 official reports of sexual assault in the ADF over five years. To break this down, this is 160 sexual assaults a year or more than 3 assaults per week. Underreporting suggests the real number is far, far higher.

These statistics are not abstract. They are lived realities. They are costs borne not by the institution, but by the women who served the organisation with honour and now struggle to survive it.

True commitment is not measured in frameworks, strategies or speeches. It is measured in whether women are safe. Whether they are heard. Whether justice, however imperfect, is done.

This is the real test of whether women belong in combat. Not whether they can carry a pack, but whether they can carry the burdens this system still places on their shoulders. The question shouldn’t be can women carry a pack. We’ve proven for decades we can. The real question should be, when will the leaders of this organisation pick up some weight these women have been carrying ?

We must continue to support women veterans, not just with words, but with action. This means listening without judgment, designing systems that do no further harm, and building communities that honour their service by addressing the inequities they still face.

Women Veterans Australia is committed to improving the lived experience of all women who serve. Whether through advocacy, research, peer connection, or policy reform, we will continue to elevate their voices and demand the structural change they deserve.

Because women who have carried the pack, both visible and invisible, should not have to carry it alone in silence anymore.

Feature image: Llani (LJ) Kennealy. Credit: Defence Images.

30 June 2025 / Latest Articles

Llani Kennealy ANZAC day address 2025

Llani (LJ) Kennealy

30 June 2025 / Latest Articles

The silence is deafening: Women in combat don’t need permission to serve

Llani (LJ) Kennealy

First Published: The Big Smoke 23 April 2025

 

Women in combat don’t need permission to serve. What they need is a Defence Force that stands with them, not silently behind them.

Recent comments by figures like Benjamin Britton and Andrew Hastie aren’t just relics of a bygone era, they’re a threat to our national security. When Hastie, the Shadow Defence Minister and former SAS officer, claimed in 2018 that “the fighting DNA of a close combat unit is best preserved when it’s exclusively male,” he didn’t just express a personal opinion. He gave voice to an ideology that sidelines half the population. Britton, echoing this sentiment by suggesting women be removed from combat roles altogether, took it a step further into outright regression.

Let’s be clear: these aren’t just outdated views; they are dangerous. They insult the service of women who’ve already fought and led in combat. They undermine the operational reality of modern defence forces and betray a fundamental misunderstanding of what makes a military effective.

Britton’s language, referring to “your women”, isn’t just paternalistic. It’s dehumanising. It strips women in uniform of their agency, casting them not as defenders of our nation but as objects to be protected, as if they are liabilities rather than assets. It’s not just sexist, it’s strategically ignorant.

Despite the seriousness of these recent remarks, there’s been nothing but silence from our veteran organisations and Defence leadership. The message is clear: when women in uniform are attacked, they are expected to defend themselves, alone.

The idea that the ADF has reached some mythical peak of cohesion, beyond the need for continued evolution, is laughable. The truth is this: inclusion does not erode effectiveness, it enhances it. Forces that fail to adapt fail to win. And those who cling to outdated ideologies are not preserving capability; they are sabotaging it.

Australia cannot afford to turn away talent. Women make up over half our population. To deny them full and equal participation in our Defence Force isn’t just unjust, it’s a catastrophic failure in national security planning. While our strategic competitors invest in AI, cyber, space, and hybrid warfare, we are still debating whether women should be full members of the team.

And yet, despite the seriousness of these recent remarks, there’s been nothing but silence from our veteran organisations and Defence leadership. That silence is not neutral, it is complicit. It empowers the armchair generals and keyboard warriors who flock to undermine women’s service at every opportunity. The message is clear: when women in uniform are attacked, they are expected to defend themselves, alone.

This isn’t just a political issue,  it’s cultural, and it’s systemic. On ANZAC Day, women who have served are still too often confronted by members of the public for wearing medals on the left side of their chest, the side that indicates they were earned by the person wearing them. The underlying assumption is that these women couldn’t possibly have earned the medals themselves and must be mistakenly wearing those of a male relative. These moments may seem minor to some, but they are far from trivial. They are everyday microaggressions that reveal a deeper, more insidious belief: that women don’t truly belong in the military, or that their service somehow counts for less.

Britton has rightly been dropped by the Liberal Party but now runs as an Independent. His campaign will be a test on how Australians respond to this kind of rhetoric. But Andrew Hastie? As Shadow Defence Minister, he holds a position with profound influence over our military future. If he truly believes women undermine combat effectiveness, then his own credibility, and his suitability for Defence leadership, must be called into question.

Leadership in Defence requires more than experience. It requires vision. Inclusivity. The courage to challenge outdated norms. Hastie’s remarks reveal a staggering lack of insight and empathy, qualities essential to any serious Defence leader.

If we’re serious about building a modern, effective Defence Force, one that reflects the people it serves, then silence is no longer an option. We must demand better. From our politicians. From our institutions. And from every leader who claims to represent those in uniform.

Women in combat don’t need permission to serve. What they need is respect. Recognition. And a Defence Force and Veteran Community that stands with them, not silently behind them.

30 June 2025 / Latest Articles

Unfinished business: The ongoing battle for women veterans

Llani (LJ) Kennealy

First Published: The Mandarin 7 Mar, 2025

 

This International Women’s Day, we are reminded that progress is not inevitable. It is fought for, step by step, voice by voice.

The theme for 2025, Keep Marching Forward, resonates deeply, especially for women veterans, who continue to push for equity, respect, and systemic change in the wake of the Royal Commission into Defence and Veteran Suicide. The commission has exposed long-standing cultural and structural barriers that have disproportionately affected women in service.

Now, more than ever, we must ensure that this moment results in meaningful reform, not just rhetoric. The fight for women veterans’ rights is ongoing, and we must continue to march forward in unison.

The findings of the royal commission have once again exposed deeply rooted issues, including gender-based discrimination, alarming levels of sexual trauma and lack of career progression. These systemic challenges, including holding perpetrators of unacceptable behavior accountable, have contributed to poor mental health outcomes for many women in Defence.

While progress has been made in integrating women into all roles, cultural and institutional barriers remain entrenched. The path forward is clear: we must march purposefully, ensuring that women’s lived experiences in the Australian Defence Force (ADF) inform the policies and programs shaping the future force. Only through this commitment can we ensure a truly inclusive and supportive environment for all who serve.

However, our momentum does not exist in isolation. Globally, we are witnessing a concerning backlash against diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives, particularly in the United States, where these programs are being dismantled at an alarming rate.

This rollback should serve as a stark reminder that progress is fragile. When voices advocating for equity are silenced, when policies ensuring inclusion are reversed, the ripple effect extends far beyond national borders.

Australia must take heed of these developments and remain steadfast in its commitment to advancing gender equality in Defence. Now, more than ever, we must safeguard our gains and continue to push for meaningful change.

It is no longer enough to simply march; we must also march with our microphones. The power of storytelling, advocacy, and persistent dialogue cannot be overstated.

Women in the ADF, both past and present, must continue to share their experiences – whether through formal testimonies, research, or public platforms, to ensure that their voices shape the policies designed to support them. Silence breeds stagnation; speaking up drives change. Equally important, we need men to actively create space for women, ensuring that every effort is made to support women’s inclusion across all facets of service and in the broader community. This collective commitment to advocacy and inclusion is the path forward to lasting change.

This International Women’s Day, we reaffirm that progress in Defence requires a sustained commitment to gender-informed leadership, accountability in implementing reforms, and unwavering support for those challenging the status quo.

It is not just about the women who serve today but about those who will follow. The next generation of women in uniform deserve a military where equality is the standard, not the exception. To value their service and pave the way for future leaders, we must ensure that the policies and culture of today create a foundation of equality and respect for those who will wear the uniform tomorrow.

We can’t afford to go backwards. The time to march is now, and we must do so with urgency and strength, ensuring that the voices of women in Defence are not just heard, but also drive the change necessary to build a stronger, more inclusive ADF.

Let’s keep marching forward, with purpose, conviction, and our microphones turned up. This is the moment to push for lasting transformation, one in which women’s contributions and experiences are central to shaping the future of our military.